Sunday, April 25, 2010
Strategic, Not Foolish
Sometimes the attempt to maintain friendly relations with all your neighbors and global powers makes you look a little silly. Just ask Oman.
While Obama headed a conference to address nuclear issues in DC, Tehran invented her own counter-conference, titled 'Nuclear Energy for All, Nuclear Weapon for No One.' And of course, Oman was in attendance. But not only did the Sultanate's Foreign Affairs Minister travel to Iran, but he publicly stated that, "The Tehran conference transparently shows the Islamic Republic pursues the disarmament of nuclear-armed countries and at the same time stresses that Iran's nuclear program follows peaceful objectives." If all we had to do to confirm the loftiness of our ideas and the nature of our initiatives, was to hold a conference purporting that we were following a certain path, I would like to schedule a conference to be held in Washington, DC. I will call it, "Puppies for all, Cats for no one." Thank goodness we won't have any more cat people living in our nation's capitol.
The juxtaposition of a conference aiming to highlight nuclear energy for peaceful goals, and Iran's recent war games couldn't be more humorous. As helicopters, speedboats, submarines, and other pieces of the Revoluntary Guard's military equipment are called into operation on the Strait of Hormuz - planting mines and performing other drills - Oman has to maintain her equilibrium while walking a tight rope. How does one sustain peaceable relations with a regional power that also borders the Strait of Hormuz, who could threaten Oman geo-politically, and one that has strong economic ties to the Sultanate; while continuing positive relations with the West, those countries that will continue to be the dominant world powers this century (this is just a realistic reading). In my opinion, Oman had been acting strategically, but the comments made by the Foreign Affairs Minister crossed over into foolish territory.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


I assume you are starting from the position that only those countries that the USA approves of are allowed to have nuclear weapons.
ReplyDeleteNope. I'm not critiquing US foreign policy & non proliferation issues.
ReplyDeleteI'm critiquing Omani foreign policy. I think that Oman is treading water between two worlds right now, and it is a difficult position to be in. I think the Sultanate has done an amazing job maintaining relative neutrality in foreign affairs in the past 40 years. However, today's relationship w/ Iran may be getting a little too cosy for US officials, and I think Oman should stay a little more down the center.
In other words, okay, you may feel obligated to attend the Iranian-hosted conference, but those comments...seriously?
We have a country that is forcing its people to live a life closer to that of animals, developing and exporting missile technology and built a nuclear weapon capability, and is theoratically in war with the US, but that is OK.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, we have a country that is developing some nuclear program that "might" give her the capability to build nuclear weapons. Its a country that is far much more democratic and free than the entire pro-west gulf country, that cant be OK.
Is the west missing something in this equation?
Well here's what I think on the matter:
ReplyDeleteYou need to be more of a cat person because whether you like it or not they love you and like to sleep on your stuff. Let's pretend I mean this figuratively so that there might be some intellectual insight weaved into my comment instead of just silliness.